In my series of error handling posts I’ve looked at
In this post I’m going to have a look at error handling in small flows. Huh, is that any different?
Not, really but when you have small flows with some action that could fail then you could consider a flow structure like this:
When an action fails you will see the flow going into the failed section of your flow.
And when an action is successful the flow will continue in the Success branch.
All of this can be done with parallel actions. You will find however that adding 4 branches after every action is less practical than the try / catch approach but for smaller flows this could be a good pattern to follow. Potentially you could even simplify the pattern by merging the Failed, Skipped and Timeout into one branch. That way there is a did run and a did not run branch. And having two branches after each potentially failing action you might find that this pattern becomes more manageable.
In Power Apps when you do a Patch to create a new item or to…
Getting started with adaptive cards can be difficult. In this post i have written some…
In this post I will look at how to create PDF documents from data. Use…
We all know this problem, you have a nested array in Power Automate but how…
Yesterday one of my clients showed me an issues where the Advanced settings didn't load.…
Have you been using the REST API instead of the create item action in Power…
View Comments